<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Katil Uşak &#187; Peter Jackson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katilusak.com/etiket/peter-jackson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katilusak.com</link>
	<description>Altıncı His'te doktor aslında...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:48:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cennetimden Bakarken &#8211; The Lovely Bones</title>
		<link>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/cennetimden-bakarken-the-lovely-bones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/cennetimden-bakarken-the-lovely-bones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="http://www.katilusak.com/author/admin/" rel="nofollow">Wrzl</a></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Wahlberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Weisz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Tucci]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katilusak.com/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lovely Bones (2009) Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, Susan Sarandon Director: Peter Jackson Genre: thriller, horror, fantasy The question I have is how can they say that they made &#x22;The Lovely Bones&#x22; into a movie when the story was barely left intact. Not only were there numerous things either changed or left out, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width:500px;height:auto;background:#0D0D0D;">
<div class="rxc" id="rxc_simple" style="background:#0D0D0D;font-family:Arial,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:13px;overflow:hidden;">
  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0380510/"><img id="rxposter" src="http://static.cinemarx.ro/poze/cache/t18/filme/2009/11/The_Lovely_Bones_2009.jpg" alt="The Lovely Bones" /></a></p>
<h3 id="rxtitlero"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0380510/">The Lovely Bones (2009)</a></h3>
<p id="rxcast">Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, Susan Sarandon</p>
<p id="rxdirectors">Director: Peter Jackson</p>
<p id="rxgenres">Genre: thriller, horror, fantasy</p>
<p id="rxdescription">The question I have is how can they say that they made &#x22;The Lovely<br />
Bones&#x22; into a movie when the story was barely left intact. Not only<br />
were there numerous things either changed or left out, but I feel that<br />
the essence of the story was lost as well. The point of the story is<br />
that a girl watches her family and her killer from heaven while she<br />
struggles to come to terms with what happened. It seems that the parts<br />
where she is in heaven she is either frolicking through a field or she<br />
is wondering what is in the lighthouse. The point of her being there<br />
was that she spent most of her time watching her family because she<br />
just couldn&#x27;t let them go. This gets completely lost in the movie. And<br />
the parts where it is with her family it seems like a whodunnit case.<br />
Once again, this wasn&#x27;t the point. On Earth Susie sees her family torn<br />
apart by the tragedy. The ending&#8230;oh god the ending. I won&#x27;t go into<br />
it in case there are people who haven&#x27;t seen it but it was complete<br />
crap. I understand that making a book into a movie is difficult and<br />
often things may need to be changed or cut out, but Peter Jackson<br />
destroyed the integrity of the story. If you can&#x27;t do the book justice,<br />
then don&#x27;t do it at a&#8230;</p>
<p id="rxtrailer"><a href="http://www.cinemarx.ro/trailere/The-Lovely-Bones-The-Lovely-Bones-2986.html" title="The Lovely Bones" target="_blank">Trailer The Lovely Bones</a></p>
<div class="rxpoweredby"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cinemarx.ro/filme/The-Lovely-Bones-The-Lovely-Bones-2986.html">by CinemaRx</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<img src="http://www.katilusak.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=827&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/cennetimden-bakarken-the-lovely-bones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url='http://www.katilusak.com/wp-content/uploads/827/watch-the-lovely-bones-166x250.jpg' length='12768'  type='image/jpg' /><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://www.katilusak.com/wp-content/uploads/827/watch-the-lovely-bones-166x250.jpg' width='100' height='151'/>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>King Kong (2005)</title>
		<link>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/king-kong-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/king-kong-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="http://www.katilusak.com/author/freelancer/" rel="nofollow">freelancer</a></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrien Brody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Serkis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Kretschmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katilusak.com/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[King Kong (2005) Cast: Naomi Watts, Jack Black, Adrien Brody Director: Peter Jackson Genre: action, adventure, fantasy Let me be the first to admit that there&#8217;s nothing wrong with a long movie, nothing at all. &#34;Titanic&#34; was a long movie that was as exactly as long as it needed to be. &#34;Gone with the Wind&#34; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width:500px;height:auto;background:#0D0D0D;">
<div class="rxc" id="rxc_simple" style="background:#0D0D0D;font-family:Arial,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:13px;overflow:hidden;">
  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360717/"><img id="rxposter" src="http://static.cinemarx.ro/poze/cache/t18/filme/2008/04/King_Kong_2005.jpg" alt="King Kong" /></a></p>
<h3 id="rxtitlero"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0360717/">King Kong (2005)</a></h3>
<p id="rxcast">Cast: Naomi Watts, Jack Black, Adrien Brody</p>
<p id="rxdirectors">Director: Peter Jackson</p>
<p id="rxgenres">Genre: action, adventure, fantasy</p>
<p id="rxdescription">Let me be the first to admit that there&#8217;s nothing wrong with a long<br />
movie, nothing at all. &quot;Titanic&quot; was a long movie that was as exactly<br />
as long as it needed to be. &quot;Gone with the Wind&quot; was a really long<br />
movie that was exactly as long as it needed to be. &quot;Dances with Wolves&quot;<br />
was a long movie that I wish had been even longer when I saw it in the<br />
theater. But &quot;King Kong&quot;? Phhewww&#8230;this sucker clocks in at least<br />
30-60 minutes longer than it needs to be. While it played, I kept<br />
inadvertently thinking to myself, &quot;Boy, we really should be out to sea<br />
by now&#8230;they haven&#8217;t reached the island yet?&#8230;man, are they EVER<br />
gonna find Ann?&#8230;jeez, when are we gonna go back to Manhattan<br />
already?&#8230;&quot; and so on. Hand to God&#8211;I actually yawned twice during the<br />
last third of this movie. I even closed my eyes for a second before I<br />
realized, &#8216;hey&#8230;you can&#8217;t just rewind this when you wake u&#8230;</p>
<p id="rxtrailer"><a href="http://www.cinemarx.ro/trailere/King-Kong-King-Kong-2424.html" title="King Kong" target="_blank">Trailer King Kong</a></p>
<div class="rxpoweredby"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cinemarx.ro/filme/King-Kong-King-Kong-2424.html">by CinemaRx</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<img src="http://www.katilusak.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=365&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/king-kong-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url='http://www.katilusak.com/wp-content/uploads/365/kingkong-166x250.jpg' length='15141'  type='image/jpg' /><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://www.katilusak.com/wp-content/uploads/365/kingkong-166x250.jpg' width='100' height='151'/>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yüzüklerin Efendisi</title>
		<link>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/yuzuklerin-efendisi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/yuzuklerin-efendisi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>freelancer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aragorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gandalf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gimli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gollum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legolas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lord of the rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lotr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mordor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noel Appleby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sala Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saruman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sauron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Astin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yüzüklerin efendisi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katilusak.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) Cast: Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Viggo Mortensen Director: Peter Jackson Genre: action, adventure, fantasy The reason why this first part of Jackson&#8217;s &#8216;Lord of the Rings&#8217; is superior to his latter two parts is because of restraint. Jackson was restrained from over doing it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="width:500px;height:auto;background:#0D0D0D;">
<div class="rxc" id="rxc_simple" style="background:#0D0D0D;font-family:Arial,Verdana,Tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:13px;overflow:hidden;">
  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120737/"><img id="rxposter" src="http://static.cinemarx.ro/poze/cache/t18/filme/2005/07/the_lord_of_the_rings_the_fellowship_of_the_ring_2001.jpg" alt="The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" /></a></p>
<h3 id="rxtitlero"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120737/">The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)</a></h3>
<p id="rxcast">Cast: Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Viggo Mortensen</p>
<p id="rxdirectors">Director: Peter Jackson</p>
<p id="rxgenres">Genre: action, adventure, fantasy</p>
<p id="rxdescription">The reason why this first part of Jackson&#8217;s &#8216;Lord of the Rings&#8217; is<br />
superior<br />
to his latter two parts is because of restraint. Jackson was restrained<br />
from<br />
over doing it with the CGI and &quot;epic&quot; battle sequences, which in my<br />
opinion<br />
does not make a story epic. Part of the reason was simply because Tolkien<br />
did not have very many battles in the first part of his book, which<br />
thankfully forced Jackson to focus on creating a believable world rather<br />
than a believable hack-n-slash action mov&#8230;</p>
<p id="rxtrailer"><a href="http://www.cinemarx.ro/trailere/The-Lord-of-the-Rings-The-Fellowship-of-the-Ring-Stapanul-inelelor-Fratia-inelului-745.html" title="The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" target="_blank">Trailer The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring</a></p>
<div class="rxpoweredby"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cinemarx.ro/filme/The-Lord-of-the-Rings-The-Fellowship-of-the-Ring-Stapanul-inelelor-Fratia-inelului-745.html">by CinemaRx</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<img src="http://www.katilusak.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=125&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.katilusak.com/sinema/yuzuklerin-efendisi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	<enclosure url='http://www.katilusak.com/wp-content/uploads/125/lordofrings_poster3big-166x250.jpg' length='17539'  type='image/jpg' /><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://www.katilusak.com/wp-content/uploads/125/lordofrings_poster3big-166x250.jpg' width='100' height='151'/>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
